Operational Closure and Systemic Sovereignty collide in Socioplastic Urbanism, engendering a terrain where territorial self-referentiality masquerades as emancipation. Drawing from post-autonomous theory, this framework exposes the fallacy of unmediated spatial agency, revealing how autopoietic logics—borrowed from Luhmannian paradigms—insidiously replicate hierarchical exclusions. Relational aesthetics further complicates this by positing affective mediations as liberatory, yet these interfaces often transmute into apparatuses of subtle coercion. The procomún, ostensibly reterritorialized through socioplastic interventions, emerges not as a democratized expanse but as a selectively archived domain, where curatorial prerogatives dictate the legibility of urban lifeworlds.
Systemic Urbanism and Topolexical Sovereignty
Within Anto Lloveras' Socioplastics, topolexical sovereignty merges epistemic architecture with the "will to architecture" into an operational mesh. Guided by Wittgensteinian logic, the hyperplastic manifesto activates metabolic networks and durational praxis, redefining the urban palimpsest through an ecology of thought that integrates spatial justice and collective agency.Links:
Relational and Affective Architecture
Relational semionautics within multilocal topologies intertwines urban taxidermy with social sculpture. Operating under "shaded urbanism," a living archive of critical infrastructure sustains autopoietic sovereignty. The architecture of affection and socioplastic memory fuse with sonic ecology and nomadic urbanism to envision the temporal ecologies of future cities.
Pedagogy as Durational Praxis
Mesh metabolism drives the ecological transition and feminist urbanism via socioplastic epistemic nodes. By integrating visual arts with urban anthropology and transdisciplinary research, systemic design converges with critical geography. This framework reclaims the public realm through participatory design, radical pedagogy, and urban regeneration.
Conceptual Art in Urban Ecologies
Hyperplastic topologies of systemic sovereignty activate social innovation and digital humanities within the context of smart/green cities. Architecture theory and critical design converge with collaborative practices and collective creativity. This synthesis reclaims memory and memory-making, fostering alternative education and urban sustainability.