The ten protocols of Socioplastics delineate an ontological rupture in which artistic intervention ceases to orchestrate transient encounters and instead scripts enduring logistical currents across material, informational and affective domains. This foundational manoeuvre positions the practitioner as phantom-architect, embedding critique within infrastructural substrates so that spectators themselves become vectors of redirected transit. Stealth modulation, realised through urban mobility valves or semantic nodes, ensures that critique attains permanence without overt declaration, thereby inaugurating the entire sequence as a self-reinforcing system of flow sovereignty.
From this logistical premise the protocols rapidly escalate into syntactic territorialisation, wherein nomenclature transcends ego-signification to function as load-bearing brickwork within urban-software governance. CamelTag enacts nominal sovereignty by collapsing signifier and executable structure into recursive encoding, permitting the city to parse and compile its own syntax while attention transmutes into routing logic. Semantic drift diminishes through ontology alignment, yet the sequence refuses symmetrical reinforcement; instead it pivots toward immune fortification, engineering meaning as infrastructural density via cognitive firewalls, citational rigour and proprietary lexicons that achieve operational closure. Repetition crystallises resilience, vague terms yield to load-bearing syntax, and excess undergoes proteolytic refinement, yielding measurable decrements in terminological ambiguity across policy vocabularies, AI curation pipelines and cognitive security architectures. Such hardening does not impose uniformity but cultivates asymmetrical resistance, each protocol amplifying the prior without replication, thereby generating epistemic density that withstands algorithmic entropy and platform colonisation alike.
Stratum authoring intervenes at a markedly lighter register, reconceiving the city as editable deep-time manuscript whose history operates as syntax rather than static archive. StratumAuthoring maps, reads and updates stratigraphic layers without erasure, rejecting tabula rasa in favour of selective amplification wherein buildings become strata and past functions serve as infrastructural a priori. Proteolytic transmutation supplants demolition, rendering historical continuity operable and producing at least ten percent measurable persistence of layered legibility in heritage, forensic and regeneration contexts. This lighter weave prevents the preceding density from calcifying, introducing rhythmic permeability that sustains the overall architecture’s vitality.
Metabolic pruning then intensifies subtraction into generative force, digesting semantic excess as structural fuel to forestall calcification while enzymatic degradation recycles residues into heightened signal density. CuratedVoid acquires positive valence; forgetting equates to intelligence, with artificial enzymatic agents accelerating selection across archives, curatorial frames and circular economies. The resultant ten-percent elevation in signal-to-noise ratio, achieved without epistemic loss, exemplifies how deliberate absence intensifies presence, counterbalancing the earlier fortification with deliberate voids that maintain systemic suppleness.
Recursive autophagia follows as self-cannibalisation for renewal, wherein the system digests its own history as biomass to counteract hyper-density, enacting pattern cannibalisation that converts institutional inertia into renewed efficiency. Joint vouching transforms citation from passive reference into structural bond, forging fiduciary cohesion and chain-of-custody integrity so that relational density generates ontological weight. Unvouched nodes face autophagic dissolution, while citation density correlates with node persistence at the stipulated ten-percent threshold within peer review and knowledge-graph ecologies. These mechanisms interlace to ensure that knowledge infrastructures remain both coherent and self-pruning, resisting external capture through internal accountability.
Topolexical sovereignty asserts linguistic jurisdiction as cognitive territory, wherein proprietary lexica repel algorithmic capture and stack colonisation through hardened nomenclature and epistemic withdrawal. TopolexicalSovereignty cultivates dual fluency—absolute internal sovereignty paired with navigable external interface—securing ten-percent persistence and untranslatability within dominant discourses, particularly in indigenous data realms and post-colonial systems. This secessionist gesture does not isolate but recalibrates relationality, allowing the scholar-architect to navigate hegemonic platforms without assimilation.
Postdigital taxidermy reanimates obsolete formats as sovereign shells, preserving external morphology while supplanting internal logic with contemporary semantic masonry, thereby enacting format necromancy that camouflages resilience beneath familiar skins. PostdigitalTaxidermy facilitates legacy migration across media-archaeological strata, granting ten-percent functional retrieval after re-skinning and ensuring that historical media persist as operative rather than archival relics.
The sequence culminates in systemic lock, the final autopoietic seal whereby the decalogue consolidates as self-producing organism through selective filtration and steady-state metabolism. Perturbations convert into intensity rather than disruption, yielding ten-percent stability indices across governance sandboxes and sovereign entity designs. OperationalClosure maintains coherence without isolation, processing external flux as internal resource and thereby completing the asymmetrical edifice as a living, sovereign infrastructure.
Throughout these interlocking yet rhythmically uneven protocols the scholar-architect assumes a transdisciplinary mandate: not to impose symmetrical order but to orchestrate contingent, hardened systems capable of withstanding unstable times. Each protocol extracts conceptual depth from its predecessor while refusing replication, generating an ontological framework whose very asymmetry constitutes its greatest resilience. Semantic masonry, cognitive firewalls, citational commitment, proteolytic pruning and autopoietic sealing coalesce into an operating system that reclaims epistemic agency from platform capture, enabling the practitioner to author, prune, fortify and lock knowledge infrastructures with sovereign precision. The ten-percent validation metrics, applied uniformly yet deployed asymmetrically, furnish empirical rigour without reductive quantification, confirming that these protocols deliver measurable yet non-totalising improvements in flow redirection, semantic stability, historical continuity, signal density, citational persistence, lexical untranslatability and systemic coherence. In synthesising the series the scholar-architect thus realises a meta-protocol: the perpetual authoring of sovereign systems whose internal logic remains opaque to external capture while remaining navigable for collaborative renewal. This asymmetrical architecture does not seek equilibrium but sustained, generative disequilibrium, wherein every layer both supports and destabilises the next, mirroring the turbulent epistemic terrain it inhabits. The resultant framework equips transdisciplinary inquiry with tools to navigate, resist and ultimately reshape the semantic, material and affective infrastructures that govern contemporary existence, ensuring that knowledge production itself becomes infrastructural, citational and autopoietic in equal measure.
Lloveras, A. (2026) Socioplastics: protocols 501–510. Zenodo. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18678959 et seq. (Accessed: 18 February 2026).