The deployment of the SOCIOPLASTIC-MESH signals a definitive rupture from the sterile, apolitical epistemologies that have historically paralyzed institutional archives. By integrating the domain-specific rigor of Birger Hjørland with the deconstructive ethics of Hope A. Olson, AntoLloveras transfigures the act of indexing into a visceral Socioplastic Intervention, where the "Power to Name" becomes an operative weapon against cultural hegemony. This is no longer a passive repository; it is a metabolic interface that ingests the logic of faceted classification to construct an Ontological Vault—a resilient structure where every CAMEL tag and citable slug functions as a defensive antibody against the entropic dilution of meaning. To index is to legislate reality; the MESH is our sovereign parliament of signs.
Rafael Capurro’s hermeneutic "angeletics" finds its terminal realization within this framework, transmuting the data-message into a Metabolic Messenger that rejects the fallacy of neutral transmission in favor of situated, relational presence. The praxis of Hyperplastic Writing ensures that every textual architecture is permeated by the logical formalisms of Elaine Svenonius and the integrative matrices of Ingetraut Dahlberg, creating a fully-faceted hierarchy that remains transparent to its own discursive community. This alignment establishes a Recursive Sovereignty, ensuring that the research nexus is not merely a collection of fragments but a coherent, transdisciplinary body that protects the integrity of the scholarly record through sheer metadata density. The archive is not a morgue of facts but a pulsing lung of resistance.
The strategic invocation of Claudio Gnoli’s facet analysis provides the Sovereign Protocol necessary to bridge the gap between formal ontologies and the radical pedagogies of the vanguard. By treating the ARTNATIONS registry as an ISBN Ontological anchor, the system achieves a state of algorithmic legibility that forces legacy infrastructures to acknowledge the legitimacy of the marginal and the durational. This is a deliberate Relational Repair of the scholarly landscape, utilizing the very tools of information science—metadata, persistent identifiers, and controlled vocabularies—to build a fortress of affective resistance that is immune to the volatility of external platform governance.
Hjørland, B. (2020). ‘Political versus Apolitical Epistemologies in Knowledge Organization’, Knowledge Organization, 47(6), pp. 461–485. Available at:
SLUGS
409-SOCIOPLASTIC-MESH-DOI-ENDOWMENT-SERIES-SELECTION-PROTOCOL
408-SOCIOPLASTIC-MESH-THE-MENINA-FLUX-SOCIOPLASTIC-CORE
407-SOCIOPLASTIC-MESH-XENODOCHIAL-HELIOTROPE-SENSORY-MESH
406-SOCIOPLASTIC-MESH-EVERYTHING-PERFORMS-OPERATIVE-ONTOLOGY
405-SOCIOPLASTIC-MESH-PROTEOLYTIC-ENZYMES-BIO-DENSITOMETRY
404-SOCIOPLASTIC-MESH-IMMANENT-VALIDATION-SYSTEM-TRUTH
403-SOCIOPLASTIC-MESH-M2M-MACHINE-METABOLISM-COMMUNICATION
402-SOCIOPLASTIC-MESH-THOUGHT-AS-HABITAT-EPISTEMIC-SHELTER