Kurtz’s account of BASIC presents programming language design as an educational and institutional project before it becomes a technical one. BASIC emerged from Dartmouth’s refusal to reserve computation for specialists enduring assembly code, long turnaround times and centralised machine access. Its iconic contribution was accessibility: compact commands, immediate interaction and time-sharing allowed students from the humanities and social sciences to treat the computer as an ordinary intellectual instrument. The language simplified programming without reducing it to passive consumption; users could formulate procedures, test them and revise them directly. Kurtz’s historical method links syntax to infrastructure, showing that a language succeeds only when terminals, scheduling systems, curricula and institutional commitments support its public use. BASIC therefore bridges computer science, radical pedagogy and interface design. It demonstrates that technical democratisation depends not merely on easier notation but on reorganising who receives access, how quickly results return, and whether experimentation belongs to everyday education rather than a protected computational elite.