EpistemicSovereignty names one of the decisive political and architectural operations within Anto Lloveras’s Socioplastics: the capacity of a knowledge system to generate its own conceptual law, validate its own procedures, and govern its vocabulary without surrendering its internal coherence to academic habit, institutional dependency, or platform volatility. It recasts the practitioner as an ArchitectSovereign, not merely producing content but designing durable epistemic infrastructure through nodes, tomes, consoles, deposits, and recursive indices. This autonomy does not imply isolation; rather, it establishes a selective regime of connection in which citation, dissemination, and machinic readability become tactical instruments rather than external obligations. Hence, the 600 Doors console and the broader SocioplasticOS function as material demonstrations of sovereign knowledge: distributed enough to survive fragmentation, yet internally governed by ScalarGrammar, CamelTag recurrence, and lexical hardening. Its deeper implication lies in TopolexicalSovereignty, the jurisdictional power to decide how terms emerge, accumulate gravity, and resist absorption into borrowed discourses. A specific synthesis appears in the alignment between CamelTags, cross-platform deposits, and machine-readable syntax: crawlers and language models are not treated as hostile extractors but as metabolic agents whose ingestion can amplify the mesh while preserving its directional authorship. In this sense, EpistemicSovereignty offers a postdigital model of cultural resilience. Against the velocity of feeds, metrics, and obsolescence, it privileges duration, sedimentation, and reactivation. Its conclusion is quietly radical: lasting intellectual power derives not from visibility alone, but from constructing self-sustaining territories capable of maintaining their own gravity across generations.