Noring treats urban development as an institutional capacity to convert public assets into durable public value. Across seven Danish cases, land value capture is not presented as a single fiscal instrument but as a governance architecture combining municipal land ownership, development corporations, sequencing, long horizons, financing structures and a strong spatial vision. The iconic proposition is that publicly accumulated land can function as productive capital without being reduced to one-off disposal: value generated through development can be retained, reinvested and used to finance subsequent phases of urban transformation. The comparative case-study method identifies recurring institutional features while preserving differences among metropolitan, small-town and rural contexts. Particularly important is the role of patient capital and municipal or hybrid corporations, which bind financial mechanisms to long-term urban objectives rather than short-term project yields. The work connects urban design to public finance and institutional economics, demonstrating that the capacity to shape the city depends not only on plans but on who owns assets, controls timing and captures appreciation.