Stuhlfauth, Saheb and Bouzouina give mobility sufficiency an unusually large evidential base. Screening more than eighteen thousand publications, they map policies against a two-sided “sufficiency corridor”: ecological demand must remain within planetary boundaries while mobility systems must still support wellbeing and equitable access. The theoretical strength of the paper is this refusal of simple reductionism. Lower mobility demand is not sufficient in itself if access, safety or equity deteriorate. Methodologically, the study combines active-learning screening, large-language-model extraction and qualitative analysis of a representative subset, producing a catalogue of seventy-one policy measures classified as sufficiency, potential sufficiency or non-sufficiency. The findings privilege structural interventions in urban form, active mobility and public-space allocation over purely behavioural or technological fixes. This shifts the scale of responsibility from individual restraint toward the spatial organisation of accessibility. The work bridges political ecology, transport policy and computational evidence synthesis while preserving a normative criterion: enough mobility must mean both materially bounded and socially enabling.
URBANISM MEETS ART